Portal de Murcia

www.portaldemurcia.com

• Home
• Business
• Hotels
• Restaurants
• News
• Advertisement

Section II of the Provincial Court has confirmed the free and the file dismissal of the complaint filed by residents of the Path of Granada Murcia against the former Directorate-General for his actions undertaken in connection with the remains found at the site of the cooperative housing 'Young Future' located on the outskirts of the hamlet town of Murcia Espinardo.

In the order of the District Court indicated that when the July 13, 2006 were discovered archaeological remains during development tasks undertaken in the land for the cooperative "Young Future ', the same day the company announced the discovery without delay the police, who alerted the local archaeologist.

After confirming that it was the remains belonging to a Roman necropolis, the next morning, ie 14 July 2006, the said archaeologist visited the site in the company of an archaeologist at the then Department for Culture and the Head of work.

Then, as specified in that order, "were established immediately so appropriate and effective measures such as conducting an archaeological survey around the project area, cleaning and archaeological documentation of the trench in which the finding occurred , the manual digging of graves located and which may be located in connection with the cleaning and comprehensive monitoring of all movements of land. "

Finalization of the archaeological survey, the July 28, 2006, the Directorate General for Culture informed the company and the Municipality of Murcia the need for a corrective action program in each of the areas of urbanization, and in this report The necessity to incorporate the building permit a clause that the movements of land would be carried out under archaeological supervision.

As dictated by the car, "the work undertaken since then been adapted to the guidelines framed by the expert opinion of Professor of Archaeology, which confirms the correctness of the excavation process and the monitoring of the work, and that no damage in the site.

This explains why the previous order of January 5, 2006 declaration that "administrative decisions taken in this regard have been quite diligent and scrupulous in the protection of archaeological remains," and, therefore, ordered the dismissal by filing actions , now ratified by the Second Section of the Audiencia Provincial de Murcia.

Source: CARM