Portal de Murcia

www.portaldemurcia.com

Murcia - SpanishMurcia - English
detail of Murcia

 

Gras: "In Joven Futura has been a botched urban and responsibility can not pay the neighbors' (07/10/2015)

The Municipal Socialist Group spokesman, Jose Ignacio Gras, said that the case Joven Futura "is an issue is so strong that it is difficult to sweeten with a grave responsibility of the City of Murcia and the Community, an urban fudge, and we will work to not have negative consequences for the neighbors because they can not afford the mistakes made by the government ".

Both the Future Young urbanization as landowners.

Statements by José Ignacio Gras occurred after attending the Board of Spokesmen -reunida in extraordinary session at the request of the Municipal Socialist Group convened after the ruling of the Supreme Court annulling the reclassification of non-developable residential land at high density .

The then Socialist councilor Marcos Ros, in the Municipal Council of 24 September 2009, expressed the opposite position of the PSOE to the reclassification of land for two reasons: the loss of lands of high ecological value and the unavailability of sufficient resources water for this urban development.

"In this racket we distinguish three clearly different elements. On the one hand, there are the neighbors as protagonists, and we have insisted on the meeting of a Technical Unit for help and advice is believed, to avoid legal problems that may arise" he said.

Although it appears that existing licenses are consolidated and will not see problems, I believe that the issue is serious enough for that unit is created.

We have made our position clear: there can be no disadvantage or detriment to the neighbors who bought a home, or those who were affected by the sale of the land, by a previous political irresponsibility ".

Socialist spokesman insisted, secondly, that "we have a clear example of unsustainable development, expression of what we want to combat, which is merely a planning outrageous, requalifying land orchard and a maximum density building. I wondered why this occurred, and have not received a response. "

Speaking to reporters, Gras insisted that "eventually tried to get the best performance of an urbanism that benefited a few. We must learn that we can not go to plan developments that harm our environment, our sustainability, as well the circumstances of planning decisions are often irreversible occurs. This is something that can not be recovered. learn, therefore, that our development is sustainable. "

Whose were the grounds?

Finally, a third element: the responsibility of those who made those choices, both in the City and Community, "some players who performed with interests that were not those of the public will all have to learn, not only politicians. but all citizens to avoid or not we facilitate that can still think that this is resolved by an overgrowth or unclear urban operations ".

He also recalled that so far no one has taken political responsibility for these acts.

Jose Ignacio Gras said that "of course, I wondered who the land before reclassification, and have not told me. This is one of the keys of the matter, because in the end, in this operation, there is always someone who is is benefiting. In a land not developable becomes one developable. I smell that whenever there is such operations are particular benefits, and the problem is not that anyone will benefit particularly, but that the public interest is harmed in Here, the heritage of the municipality of Murcia, which was garden, landscaped and archaeological values, and we have it now urbanized. "

Source: PSOE Murcia

Notice
UNE-EN ISO 9001:2000 - ER-0131/2006 Región de Murcia
© 2024 Alamo Networks S.L. - C/Alamo 8, 30850 Totana (Murcia) Privacy policy - Legal notice - Cookies
This website uses cookies to facilitate and improve navigation. If you continue browsing, we consider that you accept its use. More information