Portal de Murcia

www.portaldemurcia.com

• Home
• Business
• Hotels
• Restaurants
• News
• Advertisement

CCOO considers it an unjustified action while unfair and unsupportive in these times, which again focuses on a new cutting rights and making the crisis paying workers more vulnerable and precarious, as can happen with the group of agency staff.

Since we have positioned ourselves CCOO and publicly about the intentions of the various administrations of our environment to expand the regular working hours to 37.5 hours, when it came time to play a minor (usually 35 hours).

Yesterday he played in our university to address the issue as we had been invited trade unions for the purpose.

From the UMU, representatives of the Administration raised its claim we undertake the extension of working hours, from the current 35 hours to 37.5 hours, arguing that, among other issues, it responds to treatment for reasons of homogeneity in certain actions, as the Central Government has implemented this day, the Autonomous Community of Murcia and has also approved and are seeing how to apply, etc..

However, it was recognized by the Administration that no rule of currently collecting the possibility of extension of time (or state or regional) is directly applicable to the UMU, which we had already CCOO advance our position in public thereon.

We are surprised that while the heads of other Spanish public universities have been positioned, even collectively, in defending their policy autonomy (Madrid, for example), shielding of the claims of Regional Administrations cuts around them, at our university come the arguments used to position precisely by those who defend cuts working conditions of their workers.

That said, yesterday from CCOO propose that we are not aware that there are reasons that justify the extension of time sought.

What good are all the austerity measures and the efforts that the UMU has been doing, if in the end we're going to end up in the same bassinet that dispendiado to sack those who breach the budgetary margins limiting their actions?

Also ask what is to be achieved in the UMU with the expansion of day?

From CCOO believe that it will not assume any improvement or savings, but rather its application can generate a series of dysfunctions and grievances between different services and units of the UMU.

Also please indicate that this becomes a more of several actions that are happening gradually in a chain.

For instance that is being offered to the new interim / as that from a time now incorporated into the PAS of the UMU for certain positions waiting lists, part-time days (25 hours instead of the 35 current general), a matter for the Administration implemented a non-negotiated unilaterally even requested to review the social (unions or PAS Board and Works Council) and complaints, we also constant in the heads of the units , Depts., etc., where those affected are located, as this undermines the best possible care for labor needs.

What comes to assume this?: Normally these comrades / as, for their part, will get the job as-we know that some / a withdraws its mid-day break, but minus their wages are about the conditions other similar positions.

The cut is assuming that the payroll for a part-time 25 hours / week will be too impaired to these people to some minimum acceptable (the alternative being offered the UMU is to run the list and are not at work "in reserve" , falling in the same way that comes from private enterprise, with the happy-labor reform, or work for sandwiches or you lose your job).

As for the extension of time to 37.5 hours of work will be a concentration-when should be directed to the distribution of self-measured antisocial situation we are facing, which can offer (which try to avoid as we can) a possible loss job in our college which may affect expected in the most painful to the most vulnerable and insecure about what we will close from CCOO rows solidarity in its defense.

This, as we say, socially speaking is unfair because the bill again the crisis pay those who have not generated: the workers, which could also lead to a direct negative impact on the quality of public services that our university should contribute to society.

Thus, as we stated in the meeting yesterday at hand, from the Union Section of the Workers' Commissions are totally against the extension of working hours to 37.5 hours is to be carried out.

LAST TIME:

We are pleased that Mr. Rector has publicly a few minutes ago sent a statement through the mailing list: "official", which states that "the Chancellor is not aware of any cuts on the current budget that will translate into action involving faculty and administrative staff and services of this institution. "

Because these events coincide with the arguments of CCOO in that "there is no reason to cut", we have asked publicly to give the relevant guidelines for others responsible for the UMU not continue proposing on behalf of the Administration of this restrictive measures rights and cuts, proposing to start by removing the appropriate bodies purporting to extend the working week to 37.5 hours and passing the partial days of 25 hours until 35 ordinary hours.

Source: CCOO UMU