Portal de Murcia

www.portaldemurcia.com

• Home
• Business
• Hotels
• Restaurants
• News
• Advertisement

The statements in recent days from the Municipal PSOE constitute, as has been advanced spokeswoman Team, Nuria Fuentes, a new attempt to mislead and confuse Murcia, lying about issues on which the Court has already removed the reason PSOE several times and has condemned any of the socialist council to pay the costs of prosecution.

The Socialist Group in the day made a dual claim: first, the undervaluation of compensation made by the Consistory to the detriment of general interest and, secondly, the increase in housing areas.

However, the PSOE now avoids recall that in both cases the courts concluded that the application had been faultless planning.

With support from the PSOE

Regarding the New Condomina agreement, the PSOE seems to forget that he voted in favor.

And not only that.

Applauded and gave as an example for future agreements.

As stated in the minutes, in his speech, the then Socialist spokesman in the city of Murcia said, inter alia, that "when I said that the City obtains resources exceeding those that would result from the application of legal transfers is because they have calculated the peseta and several hypothesis in any of them, which receives the City is more than double what they would receive by applying the legal use. "

The spokesperson then added that "... We would like all urban operations being developed or will develop, what are the transparency of these and to produce a benefit that will provide half of what makes this operation."

The judgments to which they referred to are the following:

1. Judgement of the Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Murcia, dated December 30, 2005, number 983/05.

2. Judgement of the Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Murcia, dated July 16, 2006, No. 461/06.

3. Resolution of the Court of Auditors dated June 3, 2009, No. 8 / 09.

The judgments of the Superior Court of Justice confirmed, for two reasons, the full validity of the General Urban Plan of Murcia, including the management of the North, and in great detail the planning agreement which was derived from the partial plan for New Condomina approved with the affirmative votes of the PP and PSOE.

"Unequivocally"

Resolution of the Court of Auditors, on the other hand, focused on clarifying whether the city had conducted reviews of the low price of land.

The PSOE complained that he was concerned about "the low valuations that may have been made because, if so, the Consistory Murcia is leaving to join hundreds of millions of euros that remain uncollected and, therefore, millions of investment the city needs and remain unfunded in detriment of the citizens. "

The PSOE also said that the City paid 162 million euros by the agreements "when he could enter hundreds of millions of euros."

Exactly, the PSOE estimated that the figure was EUR 794,770,667.33.

The Court of Accounts, however, concluded that "clear and manifest way, the absence of any assumption of responsibility accounting" in the conventions of the North, ordered to pay costs to the Socialist councilor who filed the complaint.

An appraiser suspended

The defense of the City of Murcia in this process is articulated on several issues:

1.

Murcia City Council claimed that the sole and exclusive support that sustained the complaint of the PSOE was Arquitasa report.

2.

Arquitasa made the mistake of considering the developable land as actually zoned as building land was unsectorised.

3.

The PSOE does not notice the charge component involved in economic transfer, but wrongly equates it with the building plots for 10% of use that the owners must give the municipality.

4.

Arquitasa pricing made when he was suspended for appraisal services because of a serious offense punishable by the Ministry of Finance and confirmed by the Supreme Court dated May 11, 2006.

5.

The City Council warned that the files of the conventions were used, not only reviews the municipal architect, but others made by other companies for taxation, some of which had a rating lower than that established in the agreements.

6.

The average value of all taxes, except that of Arquitasa, was 116.45 euros per square meter.

Total transparency

In summary, all these statements support the full legality of the Zoning Plan Murcia (Plan) and specifically and especially, the planning agreements now questioned.

Thus, in light of the legal texts should be rejected as irrelevant, insidious and dubious claims made by the Socialist Party.

These statements show that has not favored the landowners and have not allowed more than the legally established buildings or places or floor not allowed to be used or protected forest.

Judgments, unequivocally, down to the following conclusions:

1. The soil whose transformation was the subject of the agreements was "before and after the signing of such agreements, systems development land assigned for transfer and integration into the public domain.

2. The New Condomina agreement complies with the law and does not constitute "reserves dispensing" or "abuse of power" as holding the PSOE.

The system does not exclude its application to other developers other than New Condomina, to affect "more than nine million square meters, so no basis to impute to the administration site selection in favor of a particular promoter."

3. The agreements are a mechanism of urban land management under the rules of the General Plan since 2001.

Under this mechanism, the land owners (not developers) can choose freely between two alternative management.

One is more buildable area, which already provides the General Plan, for which you must make a contribution to the City Council to declare as "Acting Municipal Interest", or compensate the council with a sum of money to Consistory would be used for similar actions implementation of infrastructure.

4. The increase in floor area is not produced by the planning agreement, it is foreseen in the General Plan to a maximum of 0.5 m2m2.

For all the above, any expression contrary to questions and free trial is an attack on the credibility of the municipality and the city itself, where the PSOE has the sole aim to achieve through libel and slander, which has failed to achieve to the polls.

And in this particular case, even dares to contradict their own arguments and that in its day, not only voted for the figure of planning agreements, with specific reference to New Condomina-but recommended them as a valid tool of management.

Source: Ayuntamiento de Murcia