Portal de Murcia

www.portaldemurcia.com

• Home
• Business
• Hotels
• Restaurants
• News
• Advertisement

- Alicia Morales stresses the "nonsense that Navarro Corchón tried to apply a law that was not yet in force and that the secretary brought to the Plenary an already expired procedure"

NOW MURCIA blames City Planning Councilor Antonio Navarro Corchón and the Plenary Secretary for the "torticera procedure" of the cancellation of the Fuensanta Plan, which was an initiative that the municipal training took as a motion to the Plenary of last September.

After being known today that the City Council can not overrule the partial plan, which promoted the construction of up to 1,300 homes in the sanctuary area because the revision file that was approved had expired, Now Murcia has registered a motion of urgency for tomorrow's Plenary.

This motion demands that the review and annulment of the Fuensanta Plan be initiated again, and that all the administrative procedures obviated by the Councilor of Urbanism be fulfilled.

The mayor Alicia Morales notes that "for the umpteenth time it is again confirmed that in this City Hall things are done too often late and bad.When it is not the courts that give a varapalo to the Consistory, it is the Legal Council, as has happened On this occasion. "

The spokesman of Now Murcia regrets that in the City of Murcia "go from one fudge to another, and above this is a beginner, because not knowing that can not apply to a procedure a law that is not yet in force is students of 1 ° of Law ".

Morales also points to the responsibility of the Secretary of the Plenary, "because after the approval of our motion in the September plenary session to make the ex officio review of the plan, the secretary brought the proposal for approval to the January plenary, without realizing That the deadline had expired.It is not acceptable that the secretary takes to the Plenary procedures that are already expired. "

Now Murcia reported on 9 September the existence of a new report from the Autonomous Community that definitively overturned the Plan Fuensanta, which provided for the construction of 1,300 homes and buildings of 5 floors at the foot of the sanctuary, in the Finca de la Fuensanta .

This controversial urban plan already had a report in January 2012, the director general of the Territory, which warned the City of serious breaches of urban legislation and the PGOU, as well as various technical considerations and errors of the plan, And therefore urged the Consistory to review ex officio and annul the final approval of this ZB-AZ1.2 Partial Plan.

Source: Ahora Murcia