Portal de Murcia

www.portaldemurcia.com

• Home
• Business
• Hotels
• Restaurants
• News
• Advertisement

- Angeles Micol points out that "one of the promoters is the exconcejal of the PP in the City of Murcia Juan Ramón Avilés." The amendment had the vote in favor, in 2008, of no less than 7 councilors who had been partners in Aviles, when Should have abstained "

- The mayor expects Ballesta to accept this sentence and not challenge it: "We can not dedicate more expenses in legal services and costs to defend urban projects that are indefensible, that harm the municipality and that only seek to benefit their friends"

NOW MURCIA points out that the new cancellation of a modification of the PGOU by the TSJ of Murcia "discredits once again the Mayor Ballesta and the councilman of Urbanism, Navarro Corchón, since when it was approved they were councilor of Works and general director of Urbanism, respectively ".

The mayor Angeles Micol affirms that both "have direct responsibility in these urban planning actions validated by the Autonomous Community in a shoddy way, and that now the courts are going back one after another. And they are themselves, Ballesta and Navarro Corchón, those in these Moments are at the head of the Consistory and municipal urbanism.

Micol makes the remarks after learning that the TSJ has annulled, following an administrative appeal lodged by Huermur, the amendment n ° 100 of the PGOU, which provided for the construction of an urbanization in Sucina, in an area of ​​raptors near a space Protected from the Natura 2000 network. "Not to vary," explains the councilor, "the Autonomous Community gave the approval to this action without having the necessary reports, including the water resources and the environmental impact, which had all The ballots to never get ".

The mayor emphasizes that one of the promoters is the exconcejal of the PP in the City of Murcia Juan Ramón Avilés, also exconsejero of the CAM: "The amendment n ° 100 of the PGOU counted on the vote in favor, in 2008, of nothing less than 7 councilors who had been companions of Avilés, among them the today imputed Miguel Angel House and the still today edile Maruja Pelegrin, when all of them should have abstained ".

Micol regrets that "during all these years, and still today, the municipal PP is continuously carrying forward urban developments that favor their friends, instead of defending the interest and prosperity of the municipality and all Murcia."

The councilor recalls that "a matter of days ago Now Murcia and We can denounce at a press conference the clamorous lack of sector reports in multitude of partial plans and modifications of the PGOU, a fact that the courts re-reveal."

"We hope that Ballesta accepts this sentence and does not challenge it," he adds.

"And if he decides to challenge it by taking it to the Supreme Court, he must assume the costs: we can not devote more expenses in legal services and in costs to defend urban projects that are indefensible, that harm the municipality and that only seek to benefit the friends of PP , Which is plunged into a continuous confusion between public and private interests ".

Source: Ahora Murcia