Portal de Murcia

www.portaldemurcia.com

• Home
• Business
• Hotels
• Restaurants
• News
• Advertisement

HUERMUR fears that the buildings that are part of the historical and artistic heritage of Murcia, who have been malvendidos ceasing to be public, outside interests are subject to heritage conservation, and the Autonomous Region and the city of Murcia yield to such interest .

HUERMUR has found that behind the announced change in the terms of the palace lies a change in the rules governing the construction PGOU in the historic center of Murcia.

In the submissions is apparent breach of planning regulations and the Teatro Romea BIC to have been destroyed in recent years several protected facades.

According to documents provided by the promoter, the justification given for this modification is the inconsistency PECHM that Campuzano Gonzalez palace has a height of 4 storeys in the street facade while the PGOU Manfredi gives a building of 5 floors to surrounding buildings.

And, with this modification is to open the building to tertiary use in all plants (office, retail, hospitality and equipment).

HUERMUR has objected to this amendment where showing that changes in the conditions of the palace Campuzano Gonzalez BIC involve modification of the historical-artistic and BIC Murcia Romea Theatre, and notes that the documentation submitted by promoters is poor and improper modification of a Special Plan as is the PECHM.

Add HUERMUR Association in memory of the proposed amendment, surprisingly, states that amends the rules applicable to the area MC (Centro Historico) with two new articles which called adaptations, and are redrafting Articles 5.2.2 and 5.2.3 of the General Plan of Murcia conditions governing construction and use of buildings in the city center, and that will be supposedly intended to apply to this amendment PECHM, besides being apply to the Special Plan itself and the whole area of ​​Murcia historic center.

So HUERMUR estimated that it really intends to adopt the city of Murcia is not just a specific amendment affecting PECHM Campuzano Gonzalez palace, but a modification of structural PGMOy, which also affects the palace Campuzano all buildings in the historic center of Murcia (whether or not covered by PECHM), and modifies the conditions of the Special Plan of a Historical BIC of Murcia (PECHM).

According to the Association HUERMUR used justification for the change in the conditions of the palace Campuzano Gonzalez invalid, since Article 37 of Law 4/2007 of the Cultural Heritage of the Region of Murcia provides that "specific protection regimes derivatives a declaration of cultural interest prevail over the current urban planning. "

Is PGMO which must adapt to PECHM PECHM not modify it to fit the PGMO, as it intends to do in this specific modification.

The fact that repeatedly and with total disregard for the rules protecting the cultural heritage of the city of Murcia, the City Council has permitted the destruction of the buildings that were in the vicinity of a Historical BIC of Murcia and the BIC Teatro Romea, not respecting the obligations contained in the statements of BIC, not justified now intends Campuzano Gonzalez palace adapt to these failures.

Wondering Huermur has happened in recent years with the facades of buildings in the surroundings of the Teatro Romea BIC and should be retained, and how can the existence of newly constructed buildings that exceed the five plants in the square Julián Romea .

Highlights the entity that the Romea Theatre BIC set to keep around the facades of buildings 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 of the Plaza Julian Romea, facades of buildings 1 and 3 of the street until Angel Guirao intersection with Santa Clara, facades of buildings without number 1 and 3 of the Santa Clara Street, to its intersection with Calle Echegaray, including the rear facades of buildings 3 D and 1 of the Plaza de Santo Domingo and the facade Arch Street side of Santo Domingo, 2; crosses this street straight along by the side facade of the building number 1 and crosses the street Serrano Alcázar to the point of departure, and wonders what happened to this environment in recent years.

Far to rectify, the City continues its dangerous flight forward, ending the city's cultural identity.

HUERMUR notes that changes irregularly by the City in this alleged modification PECHM card are:

- Vary the maximum building depth of the buildings, which will now be without limitation, while the PGMO published in BORM and force that depth is 15 meters.

- The occupation of the site may be total for non-residential uses, while the PGMO determines that only the ground floor.

- The height of the building identified in Article adapted in this Amendment proposal is 5 floors, forgetting that in the PGMO states that this point does not apply if the PECHM establishes another, and that the information about the palace PECHM Campuzano Gonzalez states that in Manfredi street frontage height is 4 floors.

- In the specific modification proposal seeks the change of use of buildings to its transformation from solely residential to be residential and tertiary.

- Offices and local businesses that could only be located on the ground floor and first floor lose now understood that this limitation may be carried throughout the building.

- The basement garages that are not prohibited in pedestrian and vehicular access support will not.

For these reasons HUERMUR states that we are not facing an amendment affecting PECHM tab Campuzano Gonzalez palace as advertised, but rather a modification that attempts PGMOU strain into what a mockery of regional and local authorities all citizens of Murcia, bypassing the regulations for the exclusive benefit of the few.

Source: Agencias