-In the period of public exposure, they will also propose that the intangible heritage of Murcia be included among the purposes of the Council, which in the Regional Law of Cultural Heritage is protected to the same extent as monuments, historical sites and gardens
The municipal group NOW MURCIA has abstained in the vote of initial approval of the Regulation, which reaches the full with 2 years of delay, and without including the contributions that were made in the process of writing and consulting its content, among others , that the intangible heritage be included among the purposes of the new council.
Now Murcia announces that it will also present allegations in the period of public exposure for the City of Murcia to leave out the UCAM private university from the list of ex officio members who will advise on cultural heritage to the Consistory.
The municipal training emphasizes that when the Justice is investigating the illegal constructions in BIC environment and the Ministry of Culture itself has highlighted in its reports the actions contrary to the protection of the heritage of this entity, "it does not make sense that now is the one who advises the City Council in patrimonial matters ".
Now Murcia has stressed that "when the City Council just imposed a severe fine and has ordered the cessation of activity in two large classrooms, it does not make sense that the same sanctioned company is elevated to the category of advisory entity in matters of cultural heritage."
Finally, since the formation has been exposed in the Municipal Plenary today that "we understand that to belong to the Sectoral Council of Cultural Heritage of the municipality of Murcia must be an entity that is model of exemplary conduct in the defense, protection and conservation of heritage, and the private entity UCAM understand that it is not, when it is object of reports of the General Direction of Cultural Assets ".
These reports highlighted that "the degradation of the environment is deep", where the UCAM has its headquarters, and that "it is appreciated that the environment proper of the monument has been lost and that the degradation of the environment is continuous", highlighting that "those responsible for the Catholic University knew reliably that they were acting in an environment of the Monument because for other actions they had requested authorization from the General Directorate of Cultural Assets ".
Source: Ahora Murcia